A-Level Sociology
Positivism, Interpretivism & the Nature of Social Facts
One of the most important debates in A-Level Sociology Research Methods is this:
Is society something we can measure objectively like a science…
or is it something we must interpret through human meaning?
At the centre of this debate are three key ideas:
-
Positivism
-
Interpretivism
-
Social Facts
If students understand how these link together, essays become far easier to structure and evaluate.
1️⃣ Positivism – Sociology as a Science
Positivists argue that sociology should operate like the natural sciences.
Key thinkers:
-
Auguste Comte
-
Émile Durkheim
Core Beliefs:
-
Society exists outside individuals.
-
Social behaviour follows patterns and laws.
-
We should use:
-
Statistics
-
Large-scale surveys
-
Official data
-
Experiments
-
Durkheim’s study of suicide is the classic example. He argued that suicide rates are social facts — measurable external forces influencing individuals.
2️⃣ What Are Social Facts?
Durkheim defined social facts as:
Ways of acting, thinking and feeling that exist outside the individual and exert control over them.
Examples:
-
Laws
-
Religion
-
Education systems
-
Marriage patterns
-
Crime rates
These are:
-
External
-
Measurable
-
Constraining
Positivists therefore favour quantitative data because it allows generalisation and reliability.
3️⃣ Interpretivism – Understanding Meaning
Interpretivists disagree.
Key thinker:
-
Max Weber
They argue:
-
Society is created through human interaction.
-
People act based on meanings.
-
We must understand behaviour through Verstehen (empathetic understanding).
Preferred Methods:
-
Unstructured interviews
-
Participant observation
-
Case studies
-
Qualitative research
Interpretivists argue that statistics don’t tell us why people act — only that they do.
4️⃣ The Core Exam Debate
Examiners love questions like:
“Assess the view that sociology should be a science.”
To access top marks:
-
Explain positivism clearly
-
Link to social facts
-
Contrast with interpretivism
-
Evaluate strengths and weaknesses
5️⃣ Evaluation Structure (PEEL Ready)
Positivism Strengths
-
High reliability
-
Representative samples
-
Policy usefulness
Positivism Weaknesses
-
Lacks depth
-
Ignores human meaning
-
May oversimplify behaviour
Interpretivism Strengths
-
Rich, detailed data
-
High validity
-
Captures meaning
Interpretivism Weaknesses
-
Hard to generalise
-
Researcher bias
-
Smaller samples
Why This Matters for Students
If you're studying A-Level Sociology in Hemel Hempstead or online:
Understanding this debate helps you:
-
Analyse any research methods question
-
Structure 20-mark essays
-
Link theory to method
-
Impress examiners with evaluation
In my 1:1 tuition sessions at Hemel Private Tuition, we practise:
-
Turning theory into PEEL paragraphs
-
Writing model introductions
-
Building balanced evaluations
-
Applying theory to unseen questions

No comments:
Post a Comment